MADZHAB FIQIH DI INDONESIA: Konstruksi Moderasi Beragama Dalam Perbedaan Pendapat Dan Aliran

Authors

  • Muhammad Fajar Universitas Islam Jember
  • Muhammad Ilyas Universitas Islam Jember
  • Abu Aman Siddiq al-Ghafir Universitas Islam Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56013/mjk.v1i2.3130

Keywords:

Intercultural Communication, Ogoh-Ogoh Custom, Sukereno

Abstract

In this scientific article, we conduct a comparison between the four major schools of thought in Islam, namely Hanafi, Maliki, Syafi'i, and Hambali. We collect and analyze the views and methods of each school of thought in various aspects of Islamic law, such as worship, muamalah, and jinayah. The results of this study indicate that although there are differences in views between each school of thought, they are all based on the same source of law, namely the Qur'an and hadith. In addition, we found that despite differences in legal details, all schools of thought have the same goal in implementing Islamic law, namely to improve human life and bring them closer to Allah. This study can help strengthen our understanding of the diversity of views in Islam and promote tolerance and appreciation for these differences. In addition, the results of this study can also be used as a reference for those who want to learn more about the differences and similarities between the four major schools of thought in Islam

Downloads

Published

2024-09-05

How to Cite

Fajar, M., Muhammad Ilyas, & Abu Aman Siddiq al-Ghafir. (2024). MADZHAB FIQIH DI INDONESIA: Konstruksi Moderasi Beragama Dalam Perbedaan Pendapat Dan Aliran. MAJEMUK Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1(2), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.56013/mjk.v1i2.3130

Issue

Section

Articles