Analisis Kuantitatif Terhadap Faktor Penentu Integritas Akademik Dosen Di Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56013/jcbkp.v9i1.4661Keywords:
Academic Integrity; Ethical Leadership; Organizational Culture; Workload; Ethical Competence; Organizational CommitmentAbstract
Research on lecturers' academic integrity is still relatively limited, especially those that simultaneously examine organizational and individual factors in a single structural model. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing lecturers' academic integrity in Indonesia by placing organizational commitment as a mediating variable. The study used a quantitative approach with the Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) method on 63 lecturers in Indonesia. The results showed that ethical leadership significantly influenced organizational commitment (β = 0.311; p < 0.01). Workload negatively influenced lecturers' academic integrity (β = −0.183; p < 0.05). Meanwhile, ethical competence (β = 0.263; p < 0.05), incentives (β = 0.215; p < 0.05), and academic sanctions (β = 0.222; p < 0.05) had a significant positive effect on academic integrity. In contrast, organizational culture did not show a significant effect on academic integrity (β = −0.147; p > 0.05). In addition, organizational commitment had a strong influence on lecturers' academic integrity (β = 0.391; p < 0.01) and was proven to mediate the relationship between ethical leadership and academic integrity (indirect β = 0.122; p < 0.05). The R² value of 0.709 indicates that 70.9% of the variation in academic integrity can be explained by the research model. This research contributes to the development of academic integrity studies by integrating leadership, organizational, and individual factors in one PLS-SEM-based empirical model.
Keywords: Academic Integrity; Ethical Leadership; Organizational Culture; Workload; Ethical Competence; Organizational Commitment
References
Anindi, D. S., Purwantini, A. H., & Sari, R. (2022). Perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa akuntansi: Investigasi dimensi fraud pentagon, integritas, dan religiusitas. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Papers Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tidar. https://journal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/semnasfe/article/view/535
Bahri, S., & Trisnawati, I. K. (2018). Persepsi mahasiswa prodi pendidikan bahasa Inggris UIN Ar-Raniry tentang plagiarisme tugas kuliah. Jurnal Ilmiah DIDAKTIKA, 18(2), 205–217. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/didaktika/article/view/3243
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Coghlan, D. (2024). Edgar H. Schein: The artistry of a reflexive organizational scholar-practitioner. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003366355
Damayanti, V. M., & Savira, S. I. (2022). Hubungan efikasi diri, kesiapan belajar siswa dengan kecurangan akademik pada pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi COVID-19. Character: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 9(2), 1–12. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/character/article/view/45754
Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (1988). The behavior of organisms—Skinner, B. F., years earlier in The Behavior of Organisms. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50(2), 333–341.
Ernawati, E., Anindito, A., & Atmojo, R. N. P. (2014). Sistem pendeteksi plagiarisme untuk tugas akhir mahasiswa di Universitas Bina Nusantara: Studi pendahuluan. Humaniora, 5(2), 921–929. https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/Humaniora/article/view/3082
Gultom, S. A., & Safrida, E. (2020). Analisis pengaruh fraud diamond dan gone theory terhadap academic fraud (studi kasus mahasiswa akuntansi se-Sumatera Utara). EKSIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 15(2), 135–146. https://ojs.polmed.ac.id/index.php/eksis/article/view/316
Gunawan, I. M. S. (2020). Meningkatkan kejujuran akademik mahasiswa melalui konseling kelompok values clarification. Jurnal Kependidikan, 6(1), 48–57. http://e-journal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/article/view/2313
Hafizha, R. (2021). Pentingnya integritas akademik. Journal of Education and Counseling, 3(2), 45–52. https://jurnal.masoemuniversity.ac.id/index.php/educationcounseling/article/view/56
HR, H. S. C. (2020). Budaya akademik dan kemahasiswaan. Rajawali Pers. https://books.google.com/books?id=8THKDwAAQBAJ
Ibrahim, R. (2024). Mengelola work-life balance dan integritas dalam meningkatkan kinerja dosen. Eureka Media Aksara.
Indra, F., Andreina, K., Kania, N. S., & Pratama, R. (2023). Peran joki dalam perkuliahan terhadap etika: Tinjauan dari perspektif mahasiswa dan dosen. Jurnal Bangun Manajemen dan Bisnis, 5(1), 65–74. http://ejurnal.bangunharapanbangsa.com/index.php/jbm/article/view/193
Jones, M. (2005). Organisation, culture and leadership. In M. Jones (Ed.), Construction project management: An integrated approach (pp. 45–62). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203006986
Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2017 tentang pemberian tunjangan profesi dosen dan tunjangan kehormatan profesor.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2024). Temuan hasil survei penilaian integritas pendidikan: Menyontek dan plagiarisme masih merebak di sekolah dan kampus.
Manalu, P. B., & Sari, N. (2024). Perilaku kecurangan akademik ditinjau dari penyalahgunaan teknologi informasi, integritas mahasiswa, kompetensi moral, dan kepercayaan diri. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology, 7(1), 85–96.
https://ojs.unsiq.ac.id/index.php/jematech/article/view/6093
Neubert, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Roberts, J. A., & Chonko, L. B. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0037-9
Nugraha, D. A., Fitrie, N., Nurlaila, E., & Supianti, I. I. (2020). Etika dan ketidakjujuran akademik di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 10(2), 145–156.
http://jm.ejournal.id/index.php/mendidik/article/view/89
Octaviagnes, N. A., & Hayati, K. (2025). Pengaruh kepemimpinan tidak etis terhadap komitmen organisasional (studi pada perguruan tinggi negeri di Bandar Lampung). YUME: Journal of Management, 8(1), 974–984.
Putra, E. B. E., Siregar, F., Pradipta, I., & Wibowo, A. (2024). Pengaruh AI terhadap perguruan tinggi: Analisis bibliometrik. JATI (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi), 8(1), 45–55. https://ejournal.itn.ac.id/index.php/jati/article/view/10157
Rosalia, R., & Fuad, A. J. (2019). Peran dosen dalam meminimalisasi perilaku plagiasi mahasiswa. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 2(2), 113–122. https://ejournal.uit-lirboyo.ac.id/index.php/ijies/article/view/882
Sumarto, E. R. P. (2024). Integritas akademik pada mahasiswa: Studi kualitatif dengan analisis fenomenologis interpretatif (Tesis). Universitas Negeri Jakarta. http://repository.unj.ac.id/48514
Syarif, M. (2023). Melindungi integritas akademik dengan mengembangkan sistem informasi pengaduan pelanggaran di kalangan perguruan tinggi. Jurnal RESTIKOM: Riset Teknik Informatika dan Komputer, 5(2), 120–128. https://restikom.nusaputra.ac.id/article/view/148
Yulisma, L., Sukri, S., Aida, D. N., & Rahman, A. (2023). Evaluasi kinerja badan penjaminan mutu internal dalam mendukung standarisasi pendidikan tinggi di Universitas Galuh. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 10(2), 89–98. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/jwp/article/view/11101
