Karakteristik Penyelesaian Perselisihan Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah oleh LKPP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v14i1.4051Keywords:
Characteristics, dispute resolution, PBJP, LKPPAbstract
This study aims to examine the characteristics of the PBJP dispute settlement conducted by LKPP, as well as legal certainty and the ideal concept of PBJP dispute settlement by LKPP in the future. The method utilized by this study is a normative legal review using a legal regulatory approach that examines a rule of norms and a case approach that is linear with the issues to be resolved. The results of this study show that the characteristics of dispute resolution through mediation and arbitration by an independent and professional LKPP, as well as the adoption of technology in dispute resolution can increase efficiency and transparency in procurement in accordance with the culture of deliberation in Indonesia. The regulation of dispute resolution by LKPP has not provided legal certainty, because the provisions related to dispute resolution that are excluded are contrary to higher regulations and the principles of the agreement, thus not providing legal certainty for the parties. The ideal concept of PBJP dispute resolution in Indonesia can combine local wisdom with technological developments to provide more effective and credible solutions. This will improve the efficiency and transparency of the procurement process, ensure dispute resolution is in line with local culture and values, and provide the desired legal certainty.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini mencoba untuk melihat karakteristik penyelesaian sengketa PBJP yang dilakukan oleh LKPP, serta kepastian hukum dan konsep ideal penyelesaian sengketa PBJP oleh LKPP kedepan. Metode yang dimanfaatkan oleh kajian ini berupa penelaahan hukum normatif dengan memakai pendekatan peraturan yang legal yang menelaah suatu aturan norma serta pendekatan kasus yang linier dengan isu yang akan dipecahkan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Karakteristik penyelesaian sengketa melalui mediasi dan arbitrase oleh LKPP yang independen dan profesional, serta adopsi teknologi dalam penyelesaian sengketa dapat meningkatkan efisiensi dan transparansi dalam pengadaan sesuai dengan budaya musyawarah di Indonesia. Pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa oleh LKPP belum memberikan kepastian hukum, karena ketentuan terkait penyelesaian sengketa yang dikecualikan kontrdiktif dengan peraturan di atasnya dan asas-asas perjanjian, sehingga tidak memberikan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak. Konsep ideal penyelesaian sengketa PBJP di Indonesia dapat mengkombinasikan kearifan lokal dengan perkembangan teknologi untuk memberikan solusi yang lebih efektif dan kredibel. Ini akan meningkatkan efisiensi dan transparansi proses pengadaan, memastikan penyelesaian sengketa sesuai dengan budaya dan nilai-nilai lokal, serta memberikan kepastian hukum yang diinginkan.
Kata Kunci:
Karakteristik, penyelesaian sengketa; PBJP; LKPP
References
Agung, Mahkamah. “Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung nomor: 2540/K/Pdt/2023,” n.d.
———. “Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Surabaya nomor: 701/Pdt/2022/PT.Sby,” n.d.
———. “Putusan Sela Pengadilan Negeri Jember Nomor: 127/Pdt.G/2021/PN. Jmr,” n.d.
Agustina, Shinta. “Implementasi Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 44, no. 4 (2015): 503–10. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.44.4.2015.503-510.
Athirah, Nur, dan M Nasir. “Conflict and dispute reduction mechanism of procurement method for construction industry in Malaysia,” 2015, 599–616.
Budiman, Nanang Tri, dan Supianto. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kredit Tanpa Agunan Di Kelurahan Patrang Kecamatan Patrang Kabupaten Jember.” Jurnal Rechtens 10, no. 2 (2021): 213–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v10i2.1143.
Burtch, Gordon, Yili Hong, dan Senthil Kumar. “When Does Dispute Resolution Substitute for a Reputation System? Empirical Evidence from a Service Procurement Platform,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3436213.
Canayaz, M, Jess Cornaggia, dan K Cornaggia. “Choose Your Battles Wisely: The Consequences of Protesting Government Procurement Contracts.” Public Economics: National Government Expenditures & Related Policies eJournal, 2019, 1–110. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3286711.
Cheung, S. “The Roles of Dispute Resolution in Construction Contracts,” 2014, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04429-3_1.
Detotto, C, Riccardo Marselli, Bryan McCannon, dan Marco Vannini. “Experts and arbitration outcomes: Insights from public procurement contract disputes.” Kyklos, 2024, 922–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12399.
Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.
F, Cao, dan Huang J. “Research on the Remedy System in China’s Government Procurement Contract Awarding Phase.” Journal of Investment Management 7, no. 2 (2018): 59–69. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20180702.13.
Fidelia, Tyas, dan Nada Salsabila. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup Perspektif Kearifan Lokal Indonesia.” Law Review 19, no. 3 (31 Maret 2020): 291–308. https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v19i3.1809.
FULLER, L O N L. The Morality of Law. Yale University Press, 1969. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1cc2mds.
Hietanen-Kunwald, Petra, dan Helena Haapio. “Effective dispute prevention and resolution through proactive contract design.” Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation 5, no. 1–2 (2021): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/20555636211016878.
Indonesia, Kementerain Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Hasil Penyelarasan Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Publik. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2023. https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/na_ruu_barjas.pdf.
Indonesia, Sekretaris Negara Republik. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 106 Tahun 2007 tentang Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah (2007).
Irfani, Nurfaqih. “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Pesterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 3 (2020): 305–25. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.711.
Jamil, Nury Khoiril, Achmad Hasan Basri, dan Umarwan Sutopo. “Kepastian Hukum Memorandum Of Understanding (Mou) Pada Kondisi Pandemi Covid-19 Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia.” Acta Comitas Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 7, no. 02 (2022): 189–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i02.p2.
Jamil, Nury Khoiril, dan Rumawi. “Implikasi Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Pada Keadaan Memaksa (Force Majeure) Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia.” Junal Kertha Semaya 8, no. 7 (2020): 1044–54. https://doi.org/https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthasemaya/article/view/59799.
Keyes, W N. Government Contracts in a Nutshell. In a Nutshell. West Publishing Company, 1990.
Legrand, Pierre. “European Legal Systems are not Converging.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45, no. 1 (1996): 52–81. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0020589300058656.
Lev, D S. Legal Evolution and Political Authority in Indonesia: Selected Essays. The London Leiden Series on Law. Springer Netherlands, 2000.
Liu, Jiacheng. “Administrative Litigation of Government Procurement Contract Dispute.” Clausius Scientific Press Journals Books Proceedings 2, no. 8 (2023): 45–50. https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020807.
Muhtarom, M. “Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian: Suatu Landasan Dalam Pembuatan Kontrak.” Suhuf 26, no. 1 (2014): 48–56. https://doi.org/https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/4573/4-.pdf.
Muwahid. “Metode Penemuan Hukum (rechtsvinding) oleh Hakim (Sebuah Upaya untuk Mewujudkan Hukum yang Responsif).” Al-Hukama The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 7, no. 1 (2017): 224–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15642/al-hukama.2017.7.1.224-248.
Nahak, Alfonsus. “Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Perspektif Hukum Gustav Radbruch.” Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora 2, no. 4 (2023): 11659–72. https://doi.org/https://publisherqu.com/index.php/pediaqu/article/view/386.
Othman, A. “Dispute Resolution in Petroleum Contracts.” Journal of University of Human Development 4, no. 4 (2018): 36–41. https://doi.org/10.21928/JUHD.V4N4Y2018.PP36-41.
Pratama, Riski Syandri. “ayanan Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah (LPS LKPP)sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.” Jurnal Pengadaan Barang/Jasa (JPBJ) 2, no. 1 (2023): 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55961/jpbj.v2i1.32.
Purwanto, Harry. “Keberadaan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Perjanjian Internasional.” Mimbar Hukum 21, no. 1 (2009): 155–70. https://doi.org/https://www.jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/16252/10798.
Putri, Penny. “Manajemen Konflik dan Resolusi Konflik: Sebuah Pendekatan Terhadap Perdamaian.” Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 2, no. 1 (30 Mei 2022): 16–34. https://doi.org/10.31957/pjdir.v2i1.1945.
Radbruch, Gustav. “Law’s Image of the Human.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40, no. 4 (21 Desember 2020): 667–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa026.
Rato, Dominikus. Hukum Adat Suatu Pengantar Singkat Memahami Hukum Adat di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LaksBang, 2011.
Rimmer, A. “Government rebuffs BMA’s offer of dispute resolution over junior doctor contract.” BMJ : British Medical Journal 351 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.H6280.
Santoso, Hari Agus. “Perspektif Keadilan Hukum Teori Gustav Radbruch Dalam Putusan Pkpu.” Jurnal Jatiswara 36, no. 3 (2021): 325–34. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v36i3.341.
Saraswati, A A Ratih, dan Pande Yogantara S. “Peran Notaris dalam Menentukan Jangka Waktu Sewa-Menyewa Tanah terhadap Warga Negara Asing.” Acta Comitas 06, no. 02 (2021): 438–49. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i02.p17.
Savigny, Friedrich Karl von. System of the modern Roman law, System des heutigen römischen Rechts 1. Germany: Madras : J. Higginbotham, 1867.
Shahin, Arash, Hadi Balouei Jamkhaneh, dan Reza Shahin. “The Role of E-procurement in Supply Chains BT - Developments in Information & Knowledge Management for Business Applications: Volume 4.” diedit oleh Natalia Kryvinska dan Michal Greguš, 599–616. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95813-8_25.
Sidharta, Arief. Refleksi Tentang Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999.
Simamora, Sogar. Hukum Kontrak Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Kontrak Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo, 2017.
Soemartono, G P. Arbitrase dan mediasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2006.
Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian. XIII. Jakarta: PT. Intermasa, 1991.
Tikoariaji, Wisnu. “Critical Analysis Of Law No. 30 Of 1999 On Arbitration And Alternative Dispute Resolution Related To The Potential Development And Implementation Of Online Arbitration.” Eduvest –Journal of Universal Studies 4, no. 10 (2024): 8721–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i10.39008.
Yasa, I Wayan, dan Echwan Iriyanto. “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perkara Perdata.” Jurnal Rechtens 12, no. 1 (2023): 33–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v12i1.1957.
Yuliya, Rodionova. “Conflict Resolution in Russian Public Procurement: Understanding Supplier Strategies in a State Dominated System.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3661223.
Zulfikar, Ahmad Arif. “Kajian Yuridis Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Pemerintah Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.” Widya Pranata Hukum Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum 2, no. 1 (2020): 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v3i1.82
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Achmad Hasan Basri, Nur Kholis, Dominikus Rato, Gautama Budi Arundhati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
